
Why Syria’s unity must come before all else
Last Updated on January 15, 2026 10:04 pm
By Hani Hazaimeh
The renewed clashes in and around Aleppo between Syrian government forces and Kurdish armed groups come at a moment when Syria should be consolidating peace, not reopening old wounds. After more than a decade of devastating war, the country stands at a crossroads: either it moves toward stabilization and national recovery or it risks sliding back into fragmentation and insecurity. What unfolds in Aleppo today will help determine which of those paths Syria ultimately follows.
Aleppo is not merely another battlefield. It is Syria’s economic heart, its historic trading hub and one of the country’s most diverse social mosaics. Its markets once linked Anatolia to the Arab world, its factories sustained millions of livelihoods and its neighborhoods embodied the layered identities that define Syrian society. When Aleppo is stable, Syria breathes. When it is shaken, the entire country feels the tremor.
The current tensions are therefore deeply troubling. They threaten not only public safety but the broader effort to restore a unified Syrian state after years of war and foreign intervention. Syria’s new leadership has made stability, reconstruction and national cohesion central pillars of its vision. That project cannot succeed if key regions remain locked in cycles of armed confrontation.
For Kurdish groups operating in northern Syria, this moment demands sober reflection. The Kurdish people have always been an integral part of Syria’s national fabric. Long before the war, Kurds lived, worked, traded and built families across Aleppo, Hasakah, Qamishli and Damascus. They are not outsiders in Syria; they are among its founding threads. Their culture, language and history are woven into the larger Syrian story.
That is precisely why the current standoff is so painful. When Kurdish forces prioritize narrow territorial or political gains over the country’s overall stability, they risk undermining not only Syria’s unity but also their own long-term security and legitimacy. No community in Syria can thrive in isolation. The tragedy of the past decade has shown that fragmentation only produces vulnerability — to external interference, economic collapse and endless cycles of violence.
The Kurdish question in Syria is real and it deserves to be addressed with seriousness and respect. Issues of cultural rights, political participation and local governance are not marginal concerns, they are legitimate matters that require dialogue and institutional solutions. But they cannot be advanced through military escalation that destabilizes Aleppo and risks dragging Syria back into broader conflict.
Syria today does not need more fronts. It needs bridges.
The reality is that the Syrian state is rebuilding. Institutions are being reconstituted, regional relationships are being restored and diplomatic doors that were closed for years are opening again. This is not a moment for any Syrian actor to test how far they can push the center. It is a moment to engage it — constructively, patiently and within a national framework.
For Kurdish leaders, this means recognizing that Syria’s unity is not a threat to Kurdish identity but the best guarantee of its survival. A stable, sovereign Syrian state offers far more protection and opportunity for Kurds than any fragmented arrangement vulnerable to the agendas of foreign powers. History across the region has repeatedly shown that when minority causes become tied to external geopolitical games, the communities themselves end up paying the highest price.
Aleppo is where this lesson must be applied. Any prolonged fighting there risks disrupting food supplies, electricity networks, trade routes and humanitarian access. It also risks reigniting ethnic and political tensions in a city that has suffered enough. Kurds, Arabs, Armenians and others have lived side by side in Aleppo for generations. Their shared future should not be held hostage to tactical maneuvers on the ground.
Arab engagement at this moment is equally crucial. Syria’s reintegration into the Arab environment offers a powerful stabilizing force. Arab diplomacy can provide channels for mediation, economic support and political reassurance that help all Syrian parties step back from confrontation. This is not about choosing sides, it is about choosing Syria.
Arab states understand that a stable Syria is essential for regional security. From migration flows to energy routes to counterterrorism, what happens inside Syria never stays inside Syria. Aleppo’s stability matters to Baghdad, Amman, Beirut and beyond. That is why the Arab role should focus on encouraging de-escalation, supporting dialogue and reinforcing the idea that Syria’s unity is a regional public good.
For the Syrian government, managing this moment with restraint and clarity is vital. The goal should not be to win a battle but to secure peace. That means creating political space for Kurdish participation in the national project, while making it clear that armed separatism is not compatible with Syria’s recovery.
This is a delicate balance — but it is achievable if all sides remember what is truly at stake.
Syria has lost too much to afford another cycle of internal conflict. Millions of lives were disrupted, cities were destroyed and an entire generation grew up in war. The country now has a chance, however fragile, to move beyond that nightmare. Aleppo should be the symbol of that recovery, not its undoing.
For the Kurds of Syria, this is a defining moment. They can choose to be remembered as partners in rebuilding the Syrian state — as a community that asserted its rights while safeguarding the nation’s unity. Or they can be drawn into a confrontational path that weakens everyone, including themselves.
The wiser choice is clear. Syria’s future will not be written by militias but by political compromise, national inclusion and regional cooperation. Kurds must understand that their place in Syria’s future is strongest when it is made as Syrians first.
Hani Hazaimeh is a senior editor based in Amman. X: @hanihazaimeh

