Tag: Canada

  • Canada, China slash EV, canola tariffs in reset of ties

    Canada, China slash EV, canola tariffs in reset of ties

    Canada and China struck an initial trade deal on Friday that will slash tariffs on electric vehicles and canola, as both nations promised to tear down trade barriers while forging new strategic ties during Prime Minister Mark Carney’s visit.

    The first Canadian prime minister to visit China since 2017, Carney is seeking to rebuild ties with his country’s second-largest trading partner after the United States following months of diplomatic efforts.

    Canada will initially allow in up to 49,000 Chinese electric vehicles at a tariff of 6.1% on most-favoured-nation terms, Carney said after talks with Chinese leaders including President Xi Jinping.

    That compares with the 100% tariff on Chinese electric vehicles imposed under former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau in 2024, following similar US penalties. In 2023, China exported 41,678 EVs to Canada.

    “This is a return to levels prior to recent trade frictions, but under an agreement that promises much more for Canadians,” Carney told reporters. He later said the quota would gradually increase, reaching about 70,000 vehicles in five years.

    “For Canada to build its own competitive EV sector, we will need to learn from innovative partners, access their supply chains, and increase local demand,” Carney said, turning away from Trudeau’s rationale that tariffs were needed to protect domestic producers against subsidised Chinese manufacturers.

    Relaxing EV tariffs diverged from US policy, and some members of US President Donald Trump’s cabinet criticised the decision ahead of an expected review of the US-Canada-Mexico trade deal.

    But Trump himself expressed support for Carney. “That’s what he should be doing. It’s a good thing for him to sign a trade deal. If you can get a deal with China, you should do that,” Trump told reporters at the White House.

    Agri-food partnership

    Premier Doug Ford of Ontario, Canada’s main auto manufacturing province, denounced the deal.

    “The federal government is inviting a flood of cheap made-in-China electric vehicles without any real guarantee of equal or immediate investments in Canada’s economy, auto sector or supply chain,” he said in a post on X.

    In retaliation for Trudeau’s tariffs, China in March levied tariffs on more than $2.6 billion of Canadian farm and food products such as canola oil and meal, followed by tariffs on canola seed in August.

    That led to a 10.4% slump in China’s imports of Canadian goods in 2025.

    Under the new deal, Carney said, Canada expects China will lower tariffs on its canola seed by 1 March, to a combined rate of about 15% from the current 84%.

    Canada also expects its canola meal, lobsters, crabs and peas to have anti-discrimination tariffs removed from 1 March until at least year-end, he added.

    The deals will unlock nearly $3 billion in export orders for Canadian farmers, fish harvesters and processors, Carney said.

    China’s Commerce Ministry said in a statement China was adjusting anti-dumping measures on canola as well as anti-discrimination measures on some Canadian agricultural and aquatic products in response to Canada lowering EV tariffs.

    Carney added that Xi committed to visa-free access for Canadians travelling to China, but did not give details.

    In a statement announced by China’s state-run Xinhua news agency, the two nations pledged to restart high-level economic and financial dialogue, boost trade and investment, and strengthen cooperation in agriculture, oil, gas and green energy.

    Carney said Canada will double its energy grid over the next 15 years, adding there were opportunities for Chinese partnership in investments including offshore wind.

    He also said Canada was scaling up its LNG exports to Asia and will produce 50 million tonnes of LNG each year – all destined for Asian markets by 2030.

    Carney says China ‘more predictable’

    “Given current complexities in Canada’s trade relationship with the US, it’s no surprise that Carney’s government is keen to improve the bilateral trade and investment relationship with Beijing, which represents a massive market for Canadian farmers,” said Beijing-based Trivium China’s Even Rogers Pay.

    Trump has imposed tariffs on some Canadian goods and suggested the longtime US ally could become his country’s 51st state.

    China, similarly hit by Trump’s tariffs, is keen to cooperate with a Group of Seven nation in a traditional sphere of US influence.

    “In terms of the way our relationship has progressed in recent months with China, it is more predictable, and you see results coming from that,” Carney said when asked if China was a more predictable and reliable partner than the US.

    Carney also said he had discussions with Xi about Greenland. “I found much alignment of views in that regard,” he said.

  • UK, Canada and Australia announce formal recognition of Palestinian state

    UK, Canada and Australia announce formal recognition of Palestinian state

    Britain said on Sunday it was recognising a Palestinian state after Israel failed to meet conditions including a ceasefire in the nearly two-year-old Gaza war.

    “Today, to revive the hope of peace for the Palestinians and Israelis, and a two-state solution, the United Kingdom formally recognises the State of Palestine,” Prime Minister Keir Starmer said on X.

    London’s step aligns it with more than 140 other nations but will irk both Israel and its main ally the United States.

    The decision carries symbolic weight as Britain played a major role in Israel’s creation as a modern nation in the aftermath of World War Two and has long been its ally.

    Canada and Australia also recognised a Palestinian state on Sunday and other countries are expected to do so this week at the United Nations General Assembly in New York.

    In a move that put Starmer at odds with US President Donald Trump, Britain had issued Israel with an ultimatum in July saying it would recognise a Palestinian state unless Israel took steps to end the “appalling situation” in Gaza.

    Husam Zomlot, head of the Palestinian Mission in London, called the decision a “long-overdue recognition” that “is not about Palestine, but about Britain’s fulfilment of a solemn responsibility”.

    “It marks an irreversible step towards justice, peace, and the correction of historic wrongs,” he added in a statement.

    Starmer had said in July that Britain would recognise a Palestinian state unless Israel reached a ceasefire with Hamas militants, let more aid into Gaza, made clear there would be no annexation of the West Bank, and committed to a peace process delivering a two-state solution.

    “Since that announcement in July, in fact, with the attack on Qatar, a ceasefire at this point lays in tatters, and the prospects are bleak,” Lammy said, noting Israel had also moved forward with a settlement plan.

    Starmer has been under pressure from many of his own lawmakers, angry at the rising death toll in Gaza and images of starving children.

    Britain’s historic involvement

    Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said this month there will never be a Palestinian state and has accused countries that recognise a Palestinian state of rewarding “Hamas’s monstrous terrorism”.

    Londoners voiced mixed reactions.

    “A whole lot needs to happen and peace needs to come to that region,” said 56-year-old charity director Michael Angus. “This is the first step in actually acknowledging that those people have a right to have somewhere to call home.”

    Retiree Stephen, who declined to give his last name, said the government “probably means well” but argued the move was misguided: “They are sort of abandoning Israel… and with Hamas, (they) are almost sort of supporting them.”

    Lammy previously said Britain has a historic responsibility to facilitate a two-state solution, dating back to the 1917 Balfour Declaration which pledged that the creation of a Jewish state would not infringe on Arab rights.

    British troops captured Jerusalem from the Ottoman Empire in 1917, and in 1922 the League of Nations awarded Britain an international mandate to administer Palestine during the post-war deal-making that redrew the map of the Middle East.

    “While a welcome step, Britain owes Palestine far more than recognition,” said Victor Kattan, public international law professor and adviser to the “Britain Owes Palestine” campaign, arguing for an apology and reparations for engineering violent divisions.

    The decision may mean the Palestinian Mission in London is upgraded to embassy status. It could also result in banning products that come from Israeli settlements in occupied Palestinian territories.

  • Why has Trump hit Canada with a 35 percent trade tariff?

    Why has Trump hit Canada with a 35 percent trade tariff?

    By Alex Kozul-Wright

    United States President Donald Trump has announced that he will raise import tariffs on most Canadian goods to 35 percent, even though Canada has agreed to rescind its planned digital services tax as the US demanded.

    This comes as Trump sends “tariff letters” to a host of countries this week, notifying them of planned US trade levies to take effect on August 1 if trade deals are not struck before then.

    What has Trump announced for Canada?

    In late June, Trump threatened to end trade talks with Canada over its plans to push ahead with a new digital services tax, which would hit US technology companies financially. The US president said it was “a direct and blatant attack on our Country”. Canada quickly agreed to withdraw the tax.

    But, in a letter released on his social media platform on Thursday this week, Trump nevertheless told Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney that a new 35 percent tariff – an increase from the 25 percent rate originally imposed in March – would go into effect on August 1 and would rise if Canada retaliated with new tariffs of its own.

    What do the US and Canada trade?

    Canada is America’s second-largest trading partner, after Mexico. In 2024, Canada bought $349.4bn of US goods and exported $412.7bn, according to US Census Bureau data. The upshot is that Canada runs a $63.3bn trade surplus with the US.

    Canada’s key exports to the US include oil and mineral fuels, cars and auto parts, as well as industrial machinery and nuclear reactors. On the other hand, it imports large amounts of transportation equipment, industrial chemicals and manufacturing technology from the US.

    What US tariffs does Canada already face?

    In his inaugural address after taking over the US presidency on January 20, Trump announced a 25 percent tariff on all Canadian goods and a 10 percent tariff on Canadian energy resources, claiming that Canada had a “growing footprint” in the production of fentanyl, a highly addictive and often deadly opioid drug.

    He claimed Canada was not doing enough to prevent the flow of fentanyl into the US.

    Those tariffs were paused for 30 days following assurances from Canada that appropriate action would be taken to curb the flow of fentanyl, but were then reimposed in early March after Trump declared that Canada had failed to do enough. They are now rising again, to 35 percent.

    Canada, the biggest foreign supplier of steel and aluminium to the US, was also badly hit by Trump’s separate 25 percent tariffs on steel and aluminium, which he imposed globally in March. Trump doubled that for all countries to 50 percent in June, saying the measure would protect and bolster the US metals sector.

    In March, Trump also announced a separate 25 percent tariff on imported cars and car parts. He said this would “take back” money from foreign countries that have been “taking our jobs” and “our wealth”.

    Sectoral tariffs, on things like cars and industrial metals, are separate from country-wide levies.

    For his part, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney described the auto tax move as a “direct attack” on Canadian workers.

    Until the start of Trump’s second term as US president in January this year, Canada had enjoyed years of free trade relations with the US. It is understood that Mark Carney is still trying to find ways to satisfy Trump so that a 2018 free-trade deal between the US, Mexico and Canada (USMCA) – agreed during Trump’s first term in office – can be put back on track.

    USMCA came into force on July 1, 2020, replacing the 1994 North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). It is supposed to be reviewed every six years, and since Trump returned to office, it has been blighted by disputes and non-compliance issues. Some trade commentators have suggested the agreement won’t be extended next summer.

    Trump’s Canada announcement this week also came after officials in Ottawa denounced yet another separate US plan to impose a 50 percent import tariff on copper earlier this week. Canada is one of the largest suppliers of the metal to the United States.

    Why is Trump levying all these tariffs on Canada?

    The Trump administration claims its tariffs on Canada are designed to force Ottawa to crack down on fentanyl smuggling into the US, despite only a modest flow of the drug over the border. Trump has also expressed frustration with his country’s trade deficit with Canada, which largely reflects oil purchases.

    “I must mention that the flow of Fentanyl is hardly the only challenge we have with Canada, which has many Tariff, and Non-Tariff, Policies and Trade Barriers,” Trump wrote in the letter.

    Besides more than 20 similar letters to other US trade partners so far this week, Trump says he will soon announce new tariffs for the European Union, too. As with Canada’s letter, Trump has promised to implement these new import levies from August 1.

    Do Trump’s justifications for tariffs on Canada hold water?

    Canadian government data shows that less than 0.1 percent of all seizures of fentanyl entering the US, from 2022-2024, were made at the Canadian border.

    Almost all of rest was confiscated at the US border with Mexico. Carney has also publicly committed to “stop the scourge of fentanyl” in North America, and said his government wants to work alongside the US to protect communities in both countries.

    Instead, in his first speech as prime minister, Carney said he believed that “the Americans want our resources, our water, our land, our country”.

    He has had to push back on Trump’s taunts of making Canada the “51st state of America”. Indeed, Carney predicated his recent election win on the idea that Canada should keep its “elbows up”, as he put it.

    During a meeting with Trump at the White House in Washington, DC, in May, Carney said: “Having met with the owners of Canada over the course of the campaign these last several months, it’s not for sale – won’t be for sale – ever.”

    In recent months, Carney has also been strengthening ties with the United Kingdom and the EU in a bid to diversify its exports from the US.

    Hours before Trump’s latest letter, Carney posted a picture of himself with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer on X, saying, “In the face of global trade challenges, the world is turning to reliable economic partners like Canada.”

    What was the Canadian digital tax row about?

    The US is home to some of the world’s biggest technology companies, including Apple, Alphabet/Google, Amazon and Meta. A new 3 percent digital services tax to be levied on tech companies deriving revenues from Canadian users, due to take effect in late June this year, could have cost those companies $2bn in additional taxes.

    Trump called the new tax “a direct and blatant attack on our Country” in a Truth Social post in June. He added that the US would be “terminating ALL discussions on Trade with Canada, effective immediately”.

    A few days after Trump suspended trade negotiations, Carney rescinded the tax in an effort to resume talks.

    As such, Trump’s latest tariff letter to Carney has come in spite of what many had seen as a thawing of relations between the two leaders, who remain locked in trade negotiations.

    How has Trump treated other countries?

    So far this week, Trump has sent tariff letters to 23 heads of state, notifying them of new trade tariffs. On Wednesday, he told Brazil that he plans to impose a 50 percent tariff because of its “witch-hunt” against former President Jair Bolsonaro.

    Bolsonaro, who is accused of plotting a coup, refused to publicly concede the 2022 presidential election, which he lost to current President Luiz Inacio “Lula” da Silva. Trump was similarly indicted in relation to efforts to overturn his own election loss in 2020.

    Elsewhere, Trump’s tariff letters reflect his administration’s failure to finalise dozens of trade agreements that he claimed would be easy to negotiate. Shortly after unveiling his April 2 “Liberation Day” trade levies, Trump announced a 90-day pause to try and work out these agreements.

    But on Monday, the president was forced to extend this pause again until August 1. For the most part, Trump says he is trying to rebalance large trading deficits, whereby the US imports more than it exports. However, some targeted countries – including Brazil – have trade imbalances in the US’s favour rather than their own.

    Other than Brazil, recipients of tariff letters on Wednesday included the Philippines, Moldova, Sri Lanka, Brunei, Libya, Algeria and Iraq. They were notified of tariffs as high as 30 percent.

    The rates Trump said would be imposed on Sri Lanka, Moldova, Iraq and Libya were lower than those he initially announced in early April. Tariffs on goods from the Philippines and Brunei were higher. The rate for goods from Algeria remained the same.

    On Monday, he notified Japan, South Korea and a dozen other economies of tariffs ranging from 25 percent to 40 percent.

    In an interview with NBC News on Thursday, Trump said: “We’re just going to say all of the remaining countries are going to pay, whether it’s 20 percent or 15 percent. We’ll work that out now.”

    Currently, the global baseline minimum tariff rate for nearly all US trading partners is 10 percent.

    How have markets reacted to the tariff letters?

    While the White House unfurled a stream of tariff announcements this week, financial markets have generally shrugged off Trump’s threats. The S&P 500 – the stock market index tracking the performance of the 500 largest companies in the US – and the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite both closed at record highs on Thursday.

    Experts say that recent gains in the S&P 500 suggest many investors think that Trump will ultimately back down on his tariff increases.

    Financiers have established a name for the president’s policy flip-flopping – it’s called TACO: “Trump Always Chickens Out”. Washington, so the theory goes, does not have a high tolerance for economic pressure and will back off when tariffs cause pain.

    Source: Al Jazeera

  • Indian PM Modi lands in Canada for G7 Summit, says will meet various leaders, ‘emphasise Global South priorities’

    Indian PM Modi lands in Canada for G7 Summit, says will meet various leaders, ‘emphasise Global South priorities’

    Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in Calgary of Canada on Tuesday, June 17, to attend the 51st G7 Summit in Kananaskis, Alberta, marking a significant moment in India-Canada ties following a phase of strained diplomatic relations after the killing of Hardeep Singh Nijjar.

    After landing in Canada, PM Modi said he would be meeting various leaders at the G7 Summit and emphasise the priorities of the Global South.

    In a post on X, PM Narendra Modi said, “Landed in Calgary, Canada, to take part in the G7 Summit. Will be meeting various leaders at the Summit and sharing my thoughts on important global issues. Will also be emphasising the priorities of the Global South.”

    PM Modi’s visit to Canada comes after a period of friction between New Delhi and Ottawa, triggered by Canadian allegations that Indian agents were involved in the killing of NIA-designated terrorist Hardeep Singh Nijjar outside a gurdwara in Canada in 2023.

    India had strongly rejected the allegations. The diplomatic standoff escalated as both countries expelled senior diplomats in a tit-for-tat response. New Delhi has consistently voiced concerns about extremism and anti-India activities on Canadian soil and urged Canadian authorities to take concrete steps to curb such elements.

    Before landing in Canada, PM Narendra Modi was visiting Cyprus. Upon the conclusion of the visit, MEA Secretary (West) Tanmay Lal highlighted that this marked Prime Minister Modi’s first visit to Cyprus and the first by an Indian Prime Minister in more than 20 years.

    “This landmark visit highlights the enduring friendship and trusted partnership between our two countries,” Tanmay Lal said.

  • Bangladesh Appoints Nahida Sobhan as New High Commissioner to Canada

    Bangladesh Appoints Nahida Sobhan as New High Commissioner to Canada

    By Tarikul Islam

    The Government of Bangladesh has announced the appointment of Ms. Nahida Sobhan, the current Ambassador to Jordan, as the next High Commissioner to Canada. Ms. Sobhan will succeed Ambassador Dr. Khalilur Rahman in this significant diplomatic role.

    A seasoned diplomat from the 15th batch of the BCS (Foreign Affairs) cadre, Ms. Sobhan embarked on her career in Foreign Service in 1995. She has been serving as the Ambassador to the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan since February 2020, with concurrent accreditation to Palestine and Syria. Her diplomatic tenure includes stints in Bangladesh Missions in Rome, Kolkata, and Geneva, where she held various key positions. At the Foreign Ministry headquarters, she notably served as Director General of the UN & Human Rights Wing and the Multilateral Economic Affairs Wing.

    Ms. Sobhan holds a Master of Arts degree in English Literature from the University of Dhaka and has completed several professional training courses both domestically and internationally. She has represented Bangladesh in numerous bilateral and multilateral meetings. Fluent in English and French, with Bengali as her native language, she is also currently learning Arabic.

    On the personal front, Ms. Nahida Sobhan is married and has two children. Her extensive experience and linguistic proficiency are expected to enhance Bangladesh-Canada diplomatic relations significantly.

  • Canada slaps sanctions on ‘extremist’ Israeli settlers

    Canada slaps sanctions on ‘extremist’ Israeli settlers

    Canada announced Thursday for the first time sanctions against Israeli settlers accused of committing acts of violence against civilians in the West Bank.

    The United Kingdom, France, the European Union and the United States took similar measures in recent months.

    “With these measures, we are sending a clear message that acts of extremist settler violence are unacceptable and that perpetrators of such violence will face consequences,” Foreign Minister Melanie Joly said in a statement.

    The sanctions include a ban on transactions with the settlers and on their entry into Canada.

    Among those targeted is David Chai Chasdai, accused of instigating a riot in the Palestinian town of Huwara, south of Nablus, leading to the death of a Palestinian civilian.

    Two others, Zvi Bar Yosef and Moshe Sharvit, also face US sanctions.

    And another, Yinon Levi, is accused of leading a group of settlers around the Meitarim outpost in attacks on Palestinian and Bedouin civilians, burning their fields and destroying their property.

    Israel has occupied the West Bank, home to three million Palestinians, since 1967 and around 490,000 Israeli settlers live there in communities considered illegal under international law.

    At least 491 Palestinians have been killed by Israeli forces or settlers across the West Bank since Hama’s 7 October attack on southern Israel, according to Palestinian officials.

  • Canada is seeking more cooperation from India in light of US allegations

    Canada is seeking more cooperation from India in light of US allegations

    Canada on Wednesday pressed India to cooperate in an investigation of the murder of a Sikh separatist in British Columbia after the US revealed it had foiled an assassination attempt against a Sikh separatist on its soil.

    The US Justice Department said earlier on Wednesday it was charging a 52-year-old man who had worked with an Indian government employee on a plot to assassinate a New York City resident who advocated for a Sikh sovereign state in northern India.

    The US charges come about two months after Canada said there were “credible” allegations linking Indian agents to the murder of Sikh separatist leader Hardeep Singh Nijjar in a Vancouver suburb, in June. India has rejected that allegation.

    “The news coming out of the United States further underscores what we’ve been talking about from the very beginning, which is that India needs to take this seriously,” Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau told reporters in Ottawa.

    “The Indian government needs to work with us to ensure that we’re getting to the bottom of this,” he said.

    Earlier on Wednesday, Canadian Foreign Minister Melanie Joly urged India to be more forthcoming in the ongoing murder investigation. Canadian authorities have yet to charge anyone for the killing of Nijjar.

    Referring to the Indian government, Joly told reporters: “Clearly we expect more cooperation on their part and more engagement on their part.”

    Both the United States and Canada are looking to build better ties with India to counter Chinese influence in the Indo-Pacific region, and the allegations undermine that effort.

    Neither New Delhi nor Ottawa looks likely to take dramatic steps to reconcile soon as Canada’s murder investigation proceeds and Prime Minister Narendra Modi prepares for Indian national elections by May.

  • The US needs India to buffer China, and Modi knows it

    The US needs India to buffer China, and Modi knows it

    Hal Brands; Bloomberg

    The killing of a Sikh separatist in Canada in June, allegedly by agents of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Indian government, has opened a rift between one of America’s closest allies and one of its most vital geopolitical partners. It has also illustrated an unavoidable irony of President Joe Biden’s foreign policy.

    Biden aims to bolster a threatened global order by hastening India’s rise. As India rises, however, it will act in ways that sometimes challenge the very order Washington must defend. And if Biden’s team believes, as Asia policy czar Kurt Campbell has said, that the US and India have “the most important bilateral relationship on the planet,” then Washington will probably tolerate a lot of bad behavior to keep that relationship intact.

    The geopolitical case for US-India cooperation is unimpeachable. Way back in 1904, British polymath Sir Halford Mackinder explained why.

    Thanks to the modernisation of both technology and tyranny, he wrote, there was a growing possibility that aggressive powers would dominate Eurasia and control its unmatched resources. So the era’s liberal hegemon, Great Britain, must cultivate “bridge heads” on the edges of the supercontinent — Korea, France and India — so it could keep the world in balance by keeping Eurasia divided.

    Today, large swaths of Eurasia are ruled by US enemies — a prickly, bellicose China; a vengeful, violent Russia; an expansionist Iran. India, an increasingly prosperous country of 1.4 billion people, may be the key to holding the balance — and particularly to denying China a free hand on land as it also expands at sea.

    India is no less critical as a global manufacturing hub, a contributor to resilient technological supply chains, and a diplomatic leader of the developing world. This is why Biden has so prioritised strengthening US-India relations by hosting Modi for a state visit in Washington, helping make the recent G-20 meeting a showcase for Modi’s leadership, and pursuing deeper cooperation across the board.

    Yet Biden doesn’t view India as a prospective military ally; he isn’t counting on New Delhi to rush to America’s assistance in a war with China over Taiwan. The idea is simply that America and India share a vital interest in keeping Beijing from dominating Asia and, perhaps, the world. So the US helps itself by helping India develop economically, mature militarily, and otherwise put its power athwart China’s path to primacy.

    It’s not all upside. A US president who initially talked about a great clash between autocracy and democracy has taken a very muted approach to discussing the infringement of human rights, civil liberties and political freedoms in Modi’s India — or the incendiary Hindu nationalism in which his government traffics.

    Likewise, India hasn’t done much to punish Russian President Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine. In fact, it has benefitted greatly from the war, which allows it to obtain Russian oil at discount rates. And if indeed Modi’s men killed Hardeep Singh Nijjar in Canada in June, his government is emulating the transnational repression associated with harder-edged autocracies like China, Russia and Saudi Arabia.

    The trouble with tying oneself to quasi-illiberal governments is that they tend to do the very things Washington deems corrosive to the liberal order. Indeed, if India is an indispensable partner, it remains deeply ambivalent about the system Biden means to preserve.

    India opposes Chinese hegemony, but that doesn’t mean it loves American might. New Delhi wants a multipolar system, in which India stands among the great powers, rather than a unipolar system in which Washington and its allies tower above the rest. And as India’s influence grows, it will demand great-power prerogatives — including, perhaps, the right to trample the sovereignty of other democracies by targeting domestic enemies on their soil.

    Right now, Modi’s government believes New Delhi holds all the cards. Indian officials have privately said they just don’t believe Washington will do anything to spoil the relationship, given how desperately America needs support against Beijing. They’re probably right.

    This dilemma will govern Biden’s response to Nijjar’s murder. When Russian agents poisoned one of Putin’s enemies on British soil in 2018, there was a coordinated Western response featuring mass expulsions of Russian diplomats. Canada isn’t going to get a similar level of solidarity.

    To be sure, the US is helping: American intelligence reportedly helped establish India’s complicity. But the US also reportedly asked the Canadian government to slow-roll its public accusation — even as Biden raised the issue with New Delhi behind closed doors — to avoid ruining Modi’s star turn at the G-20. Expect the Biden administration to privately tell New Delhi that this sort of extraterritorial repression is unacceptable — and to try hard to avoid any further public spat. Whether Modi listens is another matter.

    A deteriorating global situation makes the US increasingly dependent on imperfect partners that are wont to do unpleasant, even brutal things. There is no answer to Chinese power without a more assertive India — and no avoiding the fact that Washington won’t always like what such an India does.

    Hal Brands is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist and the Henry Kissinger Distinguished Professor at Johns Hopkins University’s School of Advanced International Studies.

  • ‘Exercise utmost caution’: India issues advisory for its nationals in Canada

    ‘Exercise utmost caution’: India issues advisory for its nationals in Canada

    New Delhi: A day after Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s allegation of Indian involvement in the killing of Khalistani leader Hardeep Singh Nijjar triggered a diplomatic row, India advised its citizens in Canada to exercise “utmost caution” due to growing anti-India activities and hate crimes.

    Trudeau’s claim of a “potential link” between Indian government agents and the murder of Nijjar in June was dismissed by India as “absurd and motivated”. The allegation impacted bilateral ties that are already at an all-time low.

    In an advisory aimed at Indian nationals and students in Canada and citizens planning to travel to the country, the external affairs ministry said there were also threats against members of the Indian community who “oppose the anti-India agenda”.

    The advisory reflected the worsening bilateral relationship, which deteriorated over the Canadian side’s perceived indifference to India’s calls for action against pro-Khalistan elements operating from Canadian soil.

    “In view of growing anti-India activities and politically-condoned hate crimes and criminal violence in Canada, all Indian nationals there and those contemplating travel are urged to exercise utmost caution,” the advisory said.

    “Recently, threats have particularly targeted Indian diplomats and sections of the Indian community who oppose the anti-India agenda,” it added.

    The advisory cautioned Indian nationals to “avoid travelling to regions and potential venues in Canada that have seen such incidents”.

    There are 230,000 Indian students and 700,000 non-resident Indians in Canada, according to the website of the Indian high commission in Ottawa.

    The advisory said the Indian high commission and consulates will continue to be in contact with Canadian authorities to ensure the safety and well-being of the Indian community.

    “Given the deteriorating security environment in Canada, Indian students in particular are advised to exercise extreme caution and remain vigilant,” it said.

    Indian nationals and students in Canada “must also register” with the high commission in Ottawa or the consulates in Toronto and Vancouver through their websites or the MADAD portal (madad.gov.in), the advisory said. Registration would enable the missions to “better connect with Indian citizens in Canada in the event of any emergency or untoward incident”.